Harry and Dumbledore begin to have trust issues because Dumbledore has that "poker face," something Harry resents in the later installments. An argument against that point is how important that lack of transparency was in the books. They appreciate that the cinematic version was more transparent about his feelings, a foreshadowing of the dark days ahead. One example is the scene in "Order of the Phoenix" in which he shouts, "Don't you all have studying to do?" Maybe this was more on the screenplay than the acting, but still, it could have been played more calmly Gambon could have simply raised a brow and said the line quietly, more like a parent than a scolding headmaster.īut some fans still adore "Grumbledore" – the angrier version of Dumbledore we saw in the movies. Gambon's portrayal came off as too "angry" for some fans. In the books, Dumbledore was always calm and collected, never losing his composure. The biggest gripe against Gambon is how his character strayed away from the source material canon. From then on, Gambon took over for the following six. We later learn that she was under the influence of Veritaserum, but it seems the damage had been done.Dumbledore was originally played by Richard Harris in the earliest two Harry Potter films until his death in 2002. The film, however, shows Cho revealing the details of Dumbledore's Army to Professor Umbridge - because Marietta isn't in the movies - effectively ending her relationship with Harry on the spot. When her friend, Marietta Edgecombe, betrays Dumbledore's Army by snitching on them to Professor Umbridge, Cho defends her to Harry - which leads to their breakup. The book includes a few more details about Harry and Cho's relationship, including a date in Hogsmeade and Cho's jealousy over Harry's closeness with Hermione. But it wasn't until "Order of the Phoenix" - after the untimely end to her relationship with Cedric Diggory - that the pair finally got together. The books lay the groundwork for Harry's relationship with Cho all the way back in "Prisoner of Azkaban" when his crush is first revealed. The films change a few things about Cho Chang, including the fact that she's a year older than the trio, but the biggest inconsistencies are in her relationship with Harry. Movie-Harry should've been able to see the Thestrals after his first year even if book-Harry couldn't.ĭaniel Radcliffe and Katie Leung in "Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix." In the book, he was unconscious when Professor Quirrell died, so he didn't actually witness the death - but in the film he was awake. But what's not explained is why he couldn't see them after Professor Quirrell's death in "Sorcerer's Stone." It's easy to assume that Harry was too young to comprehend his mother's death as an infant, and that's why he couldn't see Thestrals in his first year at Hogwarts. Harry saw Cedric Diggory die at the end of his fourth school year, so that makes sense, but he should've been able to see them before then since he witnessed the deaths of his mother as a baby and Professor Quirrell in his first year at Hogwarts. Luna explains this mystery by telling everyone that you can only see them if you've witnessed death. In "Order of the Phoenix," we learn that Harry can see the creatures, but Hermione and Ron can't. Thestrals are magical beings primarily used in the books to pull carriages of students to Hogwarts from Hogsmede. People can only see Thestrals if they've witnessed someone dying. uses Polyjuice Potion to impersonate Mad-Eye Moody in the fourth movie, his voice seemingly does transform. The inconsistencies continue when you take into account that when Barty Crouch Jr. That also creates a discrepancy in "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows - Part 1" when Hermione uses Polyjuice Potion to become Harry and remarks on how terrible his eyesight is.Īdditionally, Ron and Harry maintain their own voices in the second movie, which is consistent with the characters who become Harry in the first "Deathly Hallows" film, but still inconsistent with the book's description. But this isn't what we see play out in the films.įor one thing, in the second movie, Harry (as Goyle) keeps his glasses on until Draco questions it, insinuating that he doesn't get Goyle's vision from drinking the potion. This clearly tells readers that under the effects of the potion you take on both the vision and voice of the person you've become. Then he realized that his glasses were clouding his eyes because Goyle obviously didn't need them - he took them off and called, 'Are you two okay?' Goyle's low rasp of a voice issued from his mouth." When Ron and Harry use Polyjuice Potion to transform into Crabbe and Goyle in the second book, Harry's thoughts read, ". It's unclear whether the potion changes people's voices.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |